Review of “The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of The Women Who Helped Win WWII” by Denise Kiernan

author’s pic

Plot:

Most of those who helped develop the atomic bomb at Oak Ridge, Tennessee, for the Manhattan Project were unaware of what they were doing other than their jobs benefited the war effort. Because many men were gone with the wartime draft, many were women. The author seeks to draw on the experiences of various workers in different areas of the sprawling “secret city” that housed 75,000 people in 1945.

One of the early stories in the book involves Celia, a 24-year-old State Department secretary in Washington. Her department involved the “Project,” which sought out something then called “Tubealloy.” She knew nothing of it but understood the necessity of secrecy.

A transfer came in.

“Where are we going?” Celia asked her boss.

“I can’t tell you,” he told her.

Her mother would protest if it were too far away. Still, her boss would say nothing.

“Well, then, what will I be doing?”

Her boss was no more forthcoming.

“How am I going to get there?”

We’ll pick you up, and you’ll go by train. Everything will be taken care of.”

Celia signed on. It was a good job. It was for the war effort—and her brothers Clem and Al. Her mother couldn’t object to that.

This book describes the “secret city,” codenamed Site X, of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, hastily built to refine uranium for use in an atomic bomb in WWII. The women profiled come from a cross-section of jobs—payroll, janitorial, to the “calutron,” the machines used to harvest uranium, unbeknownst to their operators. The company provided the workers housing, a cafeteria, and some entertainment. The workers discovered what they’d been working on when the rest of the world did, that is, when the bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Thoughts:

Kiernan reminds the reader of how different life was like in the 1940s. Everyone had to sacrifice to win the war, and the specter of the Depression was not far behind. The author follows the subjects before, during, and after their time at Oak Ridge.

I confess I set this book aside for years before finishing it this week. Perhaps part of the reason was the reader has so many people to keep track of. The author furnishes a “Principal Cast of Characters” at the beginning of the book, which lists nine main women, plus “women of note” and other historical figures the reader may or may not know about. Not all of them, like spy Klaus Fuchs, are listed.

The narratives describe how the workers adjusted and accepted the strictures against discussing work. Those who didn’t follow the rules were never seen again, losing their jobs and homes overnight.

When the bombs dropped on Japan, and the knowledge of what they had been working on finally came to daylight through news and Roosevelt’s speeches, elation followed—surely this meant the war was ending. Brothers, husbands, fathers, and friends would be coming home soon. The sacrifices of those who would never come home had paid off, and their own work helped.

Yet, second thoughts arose once the news of the death and destruction arrived. Now what? Peaceful uses of this technology?

The author says she “compartmentalized” the narrative because the people lived compartmentalized lives. Okay, I can accept that. On the subjective side, reading it was like a dozen unconnected stories at times. That is another reason I put the book down. I picked it up again because, damn it, I wanted to finish it, and I’m glad I did.

World War II is passing out of living memory. Understanding its legacy is paramount to understanding the world we live in now, IMHO.

The book is not perfect, but it presents moving and sometimes harrowing stories. I can recommend it easily.

Title: The Girls of Atomic City: The Untold Story of The Women Who Helped Win WWII
Author: Denise Kiernan
First published: 2013

Review of “The Raven” (1935)

trailer from YouTube

This is our latest Saturday pizza and bad movie night offering, a black-and-white horror mad scientist flick that borrows many Edgar Allan Poe motifs. We watched it with Svengoolie.

Plot:

Judge Thatcher’s (Samuel S. Hinds) daughter Jean (Irene Ware) crashes her car and receives life-threatening injuries. The doctors (uncredited Jonathan Hale and Walter Miller) agree only one man— Dr. Richard Vollin (Bela Lugosi)—can perform the delicate surgery needed to save her.

At first, Dr. Vollin refuses the judge’s request to treat his injured daughter, saying he’s no longer in practice but engaged in research. The judge tells him the others have said he’s the only one.

“Oh,” says Vollin.“So they finally admit it?”

And he agrees to perform the procedure, saving Jean’s life. He then falls in love with her. She looks up to him for saving her life. This complicates matters. First, she’s engaged to a promising young man, Jerry Holden (Lester Matthews). And the judge objects.

After Jean gives an interpretative dance performance based on Poe’s “The Raven” (…to each their own), Vollin becomes obsessed with her. The judge notices.

A sad, desperate escaped convict, Edmond Bateman (Boris Karloff), comes to him with a gun, hoping to have his face changed and not be easily recognized. He tells Vollin, “I’m saying, Doc, maybe because I look ugly… maybe if a man looks ugly, he does ugly things.”

Vollin thinks about this.“You are saying something profound.”

He operates on poor Bateman, mutilating his face but promising to correct it in exchange for a favor. He then gives the butler (Cyril Thornton) the weekend off and arranges a house party. Oh, is the good stuff going to hit the fan.

Thoughts:

Vollin is obsessed with Poe. His “talisman” is a stuffed raven. When asked why the raven, a symbol of death, Vollin says, “Death is my talisman,” and hints that all doctors are a little obsessed with death. EWWW.

Nevertheless, the raven provides nice, atmospheric shadows, especially while Vollin talks to the poor judge. This gives the film a noir-ish touch.

At the same time, various actors give exaggerated reactions to the camera. The music—including compositions by Franz Liszt and Pyotr Ilyich Tchaikovsky—tends toward the heavy and emotional. This is reminiscent of the days of silent films.

When speaking to a Poe memorabilia collector, Vollin mentions that he has built models of torture items described in various Poe works. The collector asks to see them, but Vollin demurs.

Lugosi as the mad scientist, tortured by his love for the unobtainable woman, makes the film. His performance is over-the-top, but it fits into the film and the genre. He’s downright creepy and arrogant. At one point, young Jean Thatcher sits enraptured while he plays Bach’s “Toccata and Fugue in D Minor.” After he finishes, she gushes, “You’re not only a great surgeon but a great musician, too! Extraordinary man… You’re almost not a man! Almost…”

“A god?” he helpfully supplies.

While there are scenes of torture, it’s mostly in anticipation. There is no bloodshed. And happily, no cats are involved. It struck me as intense for its time but would be considered tame by current standards.

It was neither a great movie nor one I can consider fun because of its overall darkness. The pacing was a little goofy. Yet, some moments proved genuinely moving and engaging.

Oddly, for a movie of this age, I could not find it for a free download.

Title: The Raven (1935)

Directed by
Lew Landers…(as Louis Friedlander)

Writing Credits
Edgar Allan Poe…(poem)
David Boehm…(screenplay)
Guy Endore…(contributing writer) (uncredited)
Florence Enright…(dialogue) (uncredited)
John Lynch…(contributing writer) (uncredited)
Clarence Marks…(contributing writer) (uncredited)
Dore Schary…(contributing writer) (uncredited)
Michael L. Simmons…(contributing writer) (uncredited)
Jim Tully…(contributing writer) (uncredited)

Cast (in credits order)
Boris Karloff…Edmond Bateman (as Karloff)
Bela Lugosi…Dr. Richard Vollin (as Lugosi) (as Bela Lugosi)
Lester Matthews…Dr. Jerry Halden (Credits) / Dr. Jerry Holden
Irene Ware…Jean Thatcher
Samuel S. Hinds…Judge Thatcher

Released: 1935
Length: 1 hour, 1 minute

Review of “The Haunting of Maddy Clare”

author’s pic

The Stuff: In 1920s London, Sarah Piper gets a call from the temporary agency that employs her. She must meet a man in a coffee shop for the details. Everything about this job screams no, but she is behind on the rent.

Wealthy Alistair Gellis proposes an outlandish assignment. Sarah is to travel to the country to see a ghost who hates men. This ghost has already bested a local vicar, and the landowner, Mrs. Clare, will not allow Gellis, or his usual assistant, Mathew Ryder, into the barn where she appears.

Maddy, Mrs. Clare says, can be mischievous and loves to play pranks, but she is not dangerous. She was a young girl who turned up one night, unable to speak, and filthy, having been abused. The girl worked for them as a maid until she hanged herself in the barn.

Thoughts:

This is a creepy story and a great page-turner. Maddy is one mean, scare-the-bejesus-out-of-you ghost. She can speak in another’s mind and show terrifyingly convincing hallucinations. The ghost is righteously pissed off and damned if someone isn’t going to pay for it.

On the negative side, there is the obligatory roll in the hay. We get to hear in detail about Sarah’s arousal (tell me all about it…) at the sight of a man who intrigues her but about whom she knows little, other than he received grievous injuries in the recent war.

Oh, ICK. No chance to fall in love or to get to know each other. And we get a play-by-play account of the sheet-side action. No room for the imagination. I know, it’s de rigueur, but come on. The encounter is titillation for the reader, completely without emotional depth. *snore*

Nevertheless, when the characters aren’t busy with each other, this is a good old-fashioned scary ghost story.

Many thanks to my friend Tracy who passed the book on to me.

Bio: Simone St. James is a Canadian author of mystery, historical fiction, and romance novels. According to the author’s blurb, St. James worked behind the scenes in the television industry for twenty years before leaving to write full-time. Her books include The Other Side of Midnight (2015), The Sun Down Motel (2020), and The Book of Cold Case (2022). She lives outside of Toronto with her husband and spoiled cat.

Title: The Haunting of Maddy Clare
Author: Simone St. James
First published: 2012

Review of “The King’s Man” (2021)

trailer from YouTube

This week’s Saturday pizza and bad movie came by way of recommendation the dearly beloved and I watched: The Critical Drinker. He sugarcoated nothing. I do have warn anyone turning to his channel, he’s got a bit of a pottymouth. While his evaluations are frank, they’re more thoughtful than, “This sucks, man.” And they’re funny. I found little to disagree with him.

Plot:

In 1902, during the Second Boer War (1899-1902), the (fictional) Duke of Oxford (Ralph Fiennes), a Red Cross worker, arrives at a concentration camp run by his friend, Kitchener (Charles Dance). With him are his wife Emily (Alexandra Maria Lara) and his young son Conrad (Alexander Shaw). While Conrad waits in the buggy with the servant Shola (Djimon Hounsou), the Duchess of Oxford enters the camp, appalled at the condition of the inmates. They need medical attention.

Unbeknownst to them, a Boer sniper (Bevan Viljoen) lurks on the outskirts of the camp. He opens fire, killing Emily and wounding Oxford while little Conrad watches. Shola, in turn, kills the sniper.

Twelve years later, the Duke and Conrad (Harris Dickinson) arrive at the family estate by airplane. Conrad chafes at the Duke’s protectiveness; he wants to join up to fight with troops in the Great War (WWI, before it had a number), but he’s still too young to do so without he’s father’s permission. The Duke, a pacifist still mourning his wife’s death, is not about to grant that permission.

As father and son march up the steps into the mansion, the arrayed servants bow or curtsey, except Nanny Watkins. The Duke summons her into his study and warns her against displaying her special status in front of the other servants.

Hmmm….

But it’s not what you think.

Later, the Duke takes Conrad into town to get fitted for a suit at a tailor’s shop called the Kingsman. Here, he meets his old friend Kitchener. While the Duke and Kitchener talk shop, Conrad tells Kitchener’s aide-de-camp, Morton (Matthew Goode) that he’d like to join the grenadiers. Morton says he’ll see what he can do. In the meantime, Kitchener expresses concern about an old friend, Archduke Ferdinand. Would the Duke be willing to lend a hand protecting him?

In an unspecified other part of the world, Grigori Rasputin (Rhys Ifans) arrives by open manual evelvator at a cabin atop a flat rock butte. He’s late. He’s brought the Shephard a Fabergé egg in the likeness of his favorite goat. The Shephard slits the goat’s throat and, in a pronounced Scottish brogue, warns the assembled villains not to mistake fondness for weakness. In true supervillain mode, he then passes out signet rings complete with a secret compartment for a suicide pill.

Spoiler alert: the goat is avenged.

Thoughts:

I personally am not that fond of comic book/Marvel Universe stories. I find them entertaining at best, but not much more. That pretty much sums up my reaction to his movie. On the one hand, it brought up actual historical events, like the Zimmerman telegram, but it also distorted them and ripped them out of context in sometimes absurdist ways. For example, the French shot Mata Hari (Margaretha Geertruida MacLeod) as a spy in 1917. She never traveled anywhere near the White House and did not dance for, seduce, or blackmail Woodrow Wilson as depicted here.

The history isn’t meant to be taken seriously, of course. It’s meant to be absurd and amusing. If it has a broader purpose, it eluded me.

Perhaps nothing is more absurd than the confrontation with Rasputin. It accounts for what is supposed taken place during his brutal murder—poisoned, shot, and thrown into a river. There are varying accounts as to what actually happened. However, in the movie, he also table-dances, unwisely, on a pedestal table. The scene is fun and at times, amusing simply for its absurdity.

A public service note: Trying to build an immunity to cyanide by taking small doses of cyanide over a long period of time is a bad idea. Just sayin’.

The film also states that King George of England, Kaiser Wilhelm, and Tsar Nicholas of Russia were first cousins, all grandsons of Queen Victoria of England. They were related, but their relationships were more complicated than that. The Kaiser was depicted as a buffoon. While he may not have been the sharpest tool in the shed, he wasn’t quite the blithering idiot the movie portrays him as. (After the war, when the Kaiser and the Tzar have abdicated, King George muses, “Wilhelm, well, I suppose that was coming, but Nicholas…” He shudders at the thought of the assassination of the Russian royal family.)

The movie is based on The Secret Service/Kingsmen comic book series and serves as an origin story. It is the third film (Kingsman: The Secret Service (2014) and Kingsman: The Golden Circle (2017) with a fourth planned for release in 2023).

The King’s Man has been nominated by International Film Music Critics Award (IFMCA) for The Camera Operators Award. The camerawork is indeed stunning. The IFMCA also nominated it for Best Original Score for an Action/Adventure/Thriller Film. Frankly, I didn’t pay attention to the music, but I did notice the Tchaikovsky’s “1812 Overture.” It fit the over-the-top action in much of the film. A final nomination was SDSA Award for Best Achievement in Decor/Design of a Fantasy or Science Fiction Feature Film. The sets are fantastic throughout the film.

My feelings about the flick are mixed. Entertaining? Yes. History stinks. Absurdity—not off the scale, but pretty high. Fabergé egg brought to the supervillain’s lair? Table dancing? Swatting away a bomb with an umbrella? (How British) I enjoyed parts of it quite a bit, but I wouldn’t watch it again.

Because this is new, it’s not available for free download. We were able to get it from the library without hassle.


Title: The King’s Man (2021)

Directed by
Matthew Vaughn

Writing Credits
Matthew Vaughn…(screenplay by) &
Karl Gajdusek…(screenplay by)
Matthew Vaughn…(story by)
Mark Millar…(based on the comic book “The Secret Service” by) and
Dave Gibbons…(based on the comic book “The Secret Service” by)

Cast (in credits order)
Djimon Hounsou…Shola
Ralph Fiennes…Orlando Oxford
Matthew Goode…Morton
Charles Dance…Kitchener
Alexandra Maria Lara…Emily Oxford
Alexander Shaw…Young Conrad
Bevan Viljoen…Boer Sniper
Harris Dickinson…Conrad Oxford
Gemma Arterton…Polly
Rhys Ifans…Grigori Rasputin
Valerie Pachner…Mata Hari
Daniel Brühl…Erik Jan Hanussen
Joel Basman…Gavrilo Princip
Todd Boyce…Dupont
Ron Cook…Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria
Barbara Drennan…Sophie, Duchess of Hohenberg
Max Count…Young King George
Emil Oksanen…Young Kaiser Wilhelm (as Emil Okasnen)
George Gooderham…Young Tsar Nicholas
Alexa Povah…Queen Victoria
Tom Hollander…King George / Kaiser Wilhelm / Tsar Nicholas
Branka Katic…Tsarina Alix
Alexander Shefler…Tsarevich Alexei
Rosie Goddard…Grand Duchess Anastasia
Dora Davis…Grand Duchess Maria
Lucia Jade Barker…Grand Duchess Olga (as Lucia-Jade Barker)
Molly McGeachin…Grand Duchess Tatiana
Aaron Vodovoz…Felix Yusupov
August Diehl…Vladimir Lenin
Nigel Lister…Arthur Zimmermann
Kristian Wanzl Nekrasov…General Ludendorff (as Kristian Wanzi Nekrasov)
Stefan Schiffer…Ludendorff Butler
Ian Kelly…President Woodrow Wilson

Released: 2021
Length: 2 hours, 11 minutes

Review of “The Magnetic Monster ” (1953)

trailer from YouTube

This is our Saturday pizza and bad movie offering, the first of three movies following the doings of the (fictional) “Office of Scientific Investigation” (OSI). The two other later flicks are Riders to the Stars (1954) and Gog (1954).

Plot:

The opening narration tells the viewer about “new dangers” facing humanity’s existence: sound frequencies that can penetrate the human brain and destroy life, “deadly isotopes of unknown elements” that “burn and sear the flesh,” and “pilotless aircraft crashing the sonic barrier can gain complete mastery over the skies.”

“To meet this challenge to our existence, a new agency has been formed, OSI, the Office of Scientific Investigation. The operatives of the OSI are called A-men.” Not G-men, but A-men.

After reminding—or nagging— his pregnant wife Connie (Jean Byron) about her doctor’s appointment, A-man Dr. Jeffrey Stewart (Richard Carlson) kisses her good-bye outside the office and goes to work. Once inside, he greets coworker Dr. Dan Forbes (King Donovan), who tells him about climbing radiation levels in air samples he has received.

Meanwhile, in an unassuming appliance store in town, Mr. Simons (Byron Foulger) berates clerk Albert (William “Billy” Benedict) for letting the clocks in the display case run down and show the wrong time… but even the electric clock shows the wrong time. The pots and pans are all magnetized. Magnetic doors on the front-loading washers (or maybe dryers?) open and close. A push lawnmower rolls down the aisle on its own. What’s a taxpaying appliance store owner to do? Call the power company, of course, who will then pass the hot potato onto the A-men of the OSI.

Jeff and Dan’s investigation leads them to a lab above the appliance store, where one man lies dead of radiation poisoning. With Geiger counters, they find an empty lead-lined container. It’s hot. But where has the source of the radiation/magnetism gone?

Further investigation leads to a Dr. Denker (Leonard Mudie), who’s leaving town on a plane. The strong magnetism endangers the working of the engines. He’s dying but tells Jeff that he bombarded selenium (or perhaps “serrenium”—whatever that is?) with alpha particles. He also cautions to keep the new element under constant electrical current. It’s hungry. It’s a monster that will reach out with its “magnetic arm” and take the energy it wants. What Dr. Denker doesn’t get around to telling Jeff is why he did such a thing in the first place.

Jeff oversees the removal of the element to the state university. Later, alas! there is a disaster resulting in deaths. (“Not an explosion,” the viewer is told helpfully, “but an explosion in reverse. An implosion.”)

The element is unstable and needs an increasing amount of energy to avoid a crisis. Of course, the need for increasing amounts of energy itself is a crisis.

Thoughts:

The science in this is goofy. Magnetism and radiation are not related. I confess I don’t know what would happen if someone bombarded selenium with alpha particles, but probably not the events of this movie.

Setting all that aside, I thought this was a lot of fun. Besides being bizarre, the early scene in the hardware store is cute. Things show up the stodgy old boss. The visuals are weird and a bit loopy, too.

The A-men eventually seek help from a colleague in Nova Scotia, who had overseen the creation of “deltatron,” located in an old mine dug deep under the earth and the Atlantic Ocean. The deltatron can generate enough power to “overfeed” the isotope and kill it, Jerry hopes, although this is not without risk.

The deltatron itself is reminiscent of the 20s film Metropolis. It is, in fact, borrowed footage from a 1934 German film about modern alchemists titled Gold. The biggest giveaway for me was the iron cross at the end of the plunger Jerry must push to get the deltratron to go critical. The word “Danger” appears on the side of it. I don’t believe iron crosses are big decorations in Nova Scotia.

Footage of the MANIAC I (Mathematical Analyzer Numerical Integrator and Automatic Computer Model I) is also shown at work with vacuum tubes and punch cards. This did exist once upon a time at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory. In the movie, it analyzes the properties of the new element. In the meantime, a hand with a pencil makes notes on a pad covered with calculations. This is how the A-men of the OSI learn when the element will go critical again. Nifty nonsense.

The tension rises to a perhaps predictable climax near the end. The OSI pursue nullification of the element as if it were an elusive enemy. The element is inanimate, but the characters attribute malice and murder to it. Without being noir, the film also has a noir-ish feel to it.

Just before the credits roll, Jerry and Connie move into their new house. She is visibly pregnant. Jerry pauses to ponder the beauty of creation when it involves love (huh?) and the horrible results when evil intent is involved.

I liked this movie, despite its unbelievable and paternalistic aspects.

I could not find it available for free download.







Title: The Magnetic Monster (1953)

Directed by
Curt Siodmak
Herbert L. Strock…(uncredited)

Writing Credits
Curt Siodmak…(screenplay) and
Ivan Tors…(screenplay)

Cast (in credits order)
Richard Carlson…Dr. Jeffrey Stewart
King Donovan…Dr. Dan Forbes
Jean Byron…Connie Stewart
Harry Ellerbe…Dr. Allard
Leo Britt…Dr. Benton
Leonard Mudie…Howard Denker

Released: February 18, 1953
Length: 1 hour, 16 minutes

Review of “The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society 1250-1600” by Alfred W. Crosby

author’s pic

The Stuff:

The author says in the first lines of his preface that this is his third book, “in my lifelong search for explanations for the amazing success of European imperialism.” Cyrus the Great, Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, and Huayna Capac were all “great conquerors,” but they were “homebodies” compared to Queen Victoria. His argument is, in part, that Europeans in the late medieval period developed the ability and the habit of (relatively) precise measurement for both physical and intangible properties, such as hours of the day, something the author describes as “pantometry” or measuring everything.

To put the change in perspective, the author first takes the reader into the medieval view of the world, which he calls “The Venerable Model.” Time and distance did not need to be precise to be meaningful. Numbers themselves were imbued with mystical meaning from their relationship to religious stories and texts. These were often as important, if not more important, than their quantities. Ten miles could be nine miles (three times the perfect number of three, the number of the Trinity, for example) if the need arose.

He then describes a gradual but profound sea change in thinking beginning about 1250, to an outlook he calls “The New Model.” This new thinking—the need to precisely measure and quantify everything— is expressed in art (the development of perspective), music (plainsong to polyphony, written music), and bookkeeping (narrative records to double-entry bookkeeping). There is more to it than that, of course. More detailed and reliable maps allowed sailors to travel (and return) safely, bringing wares and news (and alas! disease) from faraway lands.

I liked a lot about this book. I enjoyed reading about the medieval world and the changes in the Renaissance. This was a fun read. For example, after the development of polyphonic music, people who remembered plainsong complained about the newfangled stuff. It’s comforting to know that we old fogeys have been complaining about kids’ music since at least the 14th century.

However, a flag went up when Crosby implied Queen Victoria spent her days gallivanting around that empire the sun never set on. Queen Victoria never left Europe. Hmmm…

As engaging as I found this book, I did not see that Crosby ties the change in European measuring habits to imperialism. He does not support his basic thesis. Granted, the habit and ability to measure would make imperialism easier, but whence the impetus in the first place? That’s never discussed.

IMseldomHO, Crosby also gives short shrift to knowledge gained through Arab and Indian contacts. Other people in the world measured things.

If the reader goes into the book with these expectations, it can be an enjoyable read. If the reader seeks eternal and ultimate truth, the book will disappoint.

Bio:

Alfred W. Crosby (1931-2018) was an American historian, writer, and professor specializing in environmental history. He was a professor of History, Geography, and American Studies at the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Helsinki. One of his earlier books, The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492 (1972), details plant and animal exchanges between the Americans and Europe. Among his other books are Epidemic and Peace, 1918 (1976) (Republished as America’s Forgotten Pandemic: The Influenza of 1918 1989, 2003), and Children of the Sun: A History of Humanity’s Unappeasable Appetite for Energy (2006).

Title: The Measure of Reality: Quantification and Western Society 1250-1600
Author: Alfred W. Crosby (1931-2018)
First published: 1997

Review of “X: The Man with the X-Ray Eyes (1963)”

trailer from YouTube

Our latest Saturday night pizza and bad movie offering has a mad scientist on the road to perdition. Back in the day, I watched this flick on broadcast TV. We watched it last night with Svengoolie.

Plot:

Dr. James Xavier (Ray Milland) wants humans to see further than the “visible” light spectrum. To this end, he’s working on eye drops, an experiment he’s dubbed X. The foundation paying for his work sends a liaison, Dr. Diane Fairfax (Diana Van der Vlis). He demonstrates to her how his drops work on a caged monkey. Unfortunately, the monkey dies, probably of shock.

The foundation withdraws its funding, but Dr. Xavier remains undeterred and proceeds to experiment on himself. He argues with his friend, Dr. Sam Brant (Harold J. Stone), to help him. Brant, with the dose of good sense Xavier lacks, refuses. Only after Xavier insists on going ahead alone does he agree to help him, and then… cue special effects. The viewer understands what freaked the poor monkey out but not why Xavier wants a second dose.

Comic relief arrives when the lovely Dr. Fairfax invites Xavier to a party. Why, he can see through clothing! The dancing partygoers are all young, quite becoming, and quite in the buff. (No explicit nudity is shown, however.)

In surgery the next morning, however, he’s still seeing through clothing. His colleague, Dr. Willard Benson (John Hoyt), has seriously misdiagnosed the young patient’s condition. To keep the other doctor from cutting her open, Xavier slices his hand open, rendering him incapable of surgery, and then finishes the operation in a miraculously short time.

During another argument with his friend, Xavier accidentally (and carelessly) kills him. Yeah, the road to perdition. Does he ‘fess up and turn himself in? Nah. With help from friendly Dr. Fairfax, he heads out on the lam. The next the reader sees him, he’s performing as a mind reader in a carnival with an acerbic barker, Crane (Don Rickles—really).

He rubs people the wrong way there and soon must disappear—again. Imagine that. Nevertheless, Crane sees through (sorry) Xavier and blackmails him into setting up a business. He’s a “healer,” actually, a “seer.” People come to him to receive a diagnosis—for a donation. Think he’s found his forte? His shot at redemption?

Thoughts:

Aside from the cute repetition of X all over the place, this was a serious movie. Dr. Xavier had it good in the beginning. His friend Dr. Brant gives him an eye exam and tells him his eyesight is perfect. Neither realizes his ambition is blinding him. When Dr. Fairfax asks why he wants to see further into the light spectrum, he gives this rambling, incomprehensible speech that amounts to, “Because it’s there, and I might find cool things there.”

Like bee purple? Yeah, that’d be useful for pollinating flowers.

Xavier is like a drug addict with the eye drops. He needs more—and needs money. The ability to see is a disability. He wears wrap-around sunglasses because everyday light is too much to bear.

At every step, he makes a bad choice. Not even realizing he’s killed his friend, lost his position in society, and his career wakes him up.

Not a happy movie.

Are our dreams coming true a disability? Are ambitions a bind? No—it is not the dream or the ambition per se. Xavier has sold his soul long before the drops have become a reality.

The ending is meant to shock, and it is depressing.

X: The Man with the X-Ray Eyes was a nominee for the Astronave d’argento (Silver Spacecraft) for best film at the 1963 Trieste Science+Fiction Festival.

I could not find this available for a free download.




Title: X: The Man with the X-Ray Eyes (1963)

Directed by
Roger Corman

Writing Credits
Robert Dillon…(screenplay) and
Ray Russell…(screenplay)
Ray Russell…(story)

Cast (in credits order)
Ray Milland…Dr. James Xavier
Diana Van der Vlis…Dr. Diane Fairfax (as Diana van der Vlis)
Harold J. Stone…Dr. Sam Brant
John Hoyt…Dr. Willard Benson
Don Rickles…Crane

Released: September 18, 1963
Length: 1 hour, 19 minutes

Review of “The Bounty: The True Story of the Mutiny on the Bounty”

author’s image

The Stuff:

In April 1789, crew members of HMS Bounty mutinied in the South Pacific near Tofua and set their captain adrift in a launch with eighteen loyal crew members. Some of the mutineers would settle on Tahiti. Others would settle on uninhabited Pitcairn. Three would eventually hang. Some would receive pardons, and others would be acquitted.

Alexander’s account begins with a young (thirty-three) naval officer, Lieutenant Bligh, awaiting his final sailing orders. The author notes some complications: Blligh is departing late in the year when he will meet the worst weather at Cape Horn. The ship is small, and the Admiralty has not assigned it marines, as was the custom.

The first section ends with the surprising (to the recipients) letters from Bligh from a Dutch colony—not where he is supposed to be—some to the authorities and one to his wife: “my dear dear Betsy…I have lost the Bounty.”

The author takes pains to document with primary sources every transaction—the letters, the public notices, the legal accounts. For example, in recounting the courts marital of the mutineers, she discusses the backgrounds of the judges and the weather on the days of the trials. This level of detail might seem tedious at times, but she has a story to tell, and she tells the complete story.

The recollections and testimonies of the various participants often conflict. The author relates each one with minimal interference. The narrative continues beyond the trial, with sentences carried out and pardons.

The author shows how the story became a sensation in its own time, with the truth disregarded for the sake of a good tale. She also posits that with all his faults, was Captain Bligh a Captain Bligh? That is, was his reputation as a martinet exaggerated, perhaps in an effort to save a well-connected young man? She examines his post-Bounty career.

The fate of the mutineers who were not apprehended is related, as much as it can be, by the single surviving crew member found on Pitcairn Island some twenty years after the mutiny.

I liked this book, despite its tendency to get bogged down in details on occasion. Thankfully, the author romanticized nothing and held up no one as a hero. There was no single answer as to why Fletcher Christian mutinied. Clearly, he was unhappy. The story left one with the impression of how sad it all was. After all, the original mission was to find a cheap food source for slaves in the West Indies.

Bio:

Caroline Alexander (b. 1956) is an author, classicist, and filmmaker. She studied philosophy and theology at Oxford as a Rhodes scholar and has a doctorate in classics from Columbia University. She has written for The New Yorker, Granta, Condé Nast Traveler, Smithsonian, Outside, and National Geographic. Her books include The War that Killed Achilles: The True Story of the Iliad and the Trojan War (2009), Lost Gold of the Dark Ages: War, Treasure and the Mystery of the Saxons (2011), and The Iliad: A New Translation (2015).

Title: The Bounty: The True Story of the Mutiny on the Bounty
Author: Caroline Alexander (b. 1956)
First published: 2003

Review of “Yongary, Monster from the Deep” original title “Taekoesu Yonggary”(1967)

This is our Saturday pizza and bad movie offering, a Mystery Science Theater gem of a Godzilla imitator from Korea—except there’s more than meets the eye. Time for a glass of prosecco.

Plot:

The movie begins with a wedding between Astronaut Yoo Kwang-nam (Soon-jae Lee) and the lovely Yoo Soon-a (Jeong-im Nam). As they depart for their honeymoon, brat Icho (Kwang Ho Lee) tells them he has a surprise for them.

Driving down the road, the new Mr. and Mrs. Yoo are suddenly overcome with itching and have to get out of the car. Oh, what has that little scamp done? Lucky for them, their scientist friend Il-lu (Yeong-il Oh) is driving behind them. (EW. Dude. They’re off on their honeymoon. Leave them alone.)

Il-oo finds the boy Icho hiding behind some rocks, shooting an “itch ray” at the newlyweds.

“I told you I had a surprise,” the youngster says.”

Such a lovable imp. Il-lu scolds the boy for stealing his itch ray and takes him back to the lab.

The newlyweds continue on their way.

At the hotel, Soon-a has just changed into a (modest) frilly nightgown. Kwang-nam sits staring at curtains. Or maybe it’s the sky. When she starts to snuggle  (chastely) with the new hubby, the phone rings. It’s Soon-a’s dad and Kwang-nam’s boss. Kwang-nam must return to headquarters immediately. There seems to have been a nuclear test in the Middle East and he’s the only one who can fly a reconnaissance mission of it.

In a rocket.

Following the nuclear test, an earthquake strikes. The important people are puzzled. Its epicenter is moving—toward Korea!

Thoughts:

At first blush, Yongary appears to be nothing more than Godzilla with a horn pasted on its schnoz. This is partly because Yongary looks like Godzilla with a horn pasted on its schnoz.

Most of the factual and background material in the following commentary comes from American film Steve Ryfle, commentator and Korean film journalist and blogger Kim Song-o, available here.

While no one will argue this is an art film, this version suffers from bad translations and non-Korean inability to pick up on some cultural references. I know as much about Korea as you average English speaker and do not speak a word, not even enough to ask the way to the ladies’ room.

The gods know there are goofy things galore in this flick. Sending a man into orbit to check out a nuclear explosion? An earthquake with a moving epicenter? “Itch-ray”? Um, yeah.

All but about 45 minutes of the original Korean version is lost. The version available in the States was dubbed and originally aired on TV. It was later released for home viewing.

In the commentary available on YouTube, Kim Song-o says he has read the original Korean script. The discrepancies are not major but deal mainly with generalities versus specifics. Some of the characters’ names are changed as well. For instance, the boy, called, Icho in the dubbed version, is Young. (“Icho isn’t even a Korean name!”) The scientist called Il-oo is Il-woo.

There are things that non-Koreans will inevitably miss. For example, one of the buildings Yongary smashes bears a striking resemblance to a building that the Japanese colonial government used. Patriotic helicopter pilots (…on strings…I know. Spoil the moment.) lure Yongary away from one of the historic Eight Gates in the city of Seoul, revered landmarks established in the fourteenth century.

However, if you’re paying attention (and paid attention in history class), you’ll hear that, after the nuclear test and the earthquake with the moving epicenter, Yongary emerged from a crack in the ground in Panmunjom, Korea, the city where the ceasefire of the Korean War was signed.

The movie also uses the trope of the precocious child who has an odd connection with a monster.

It is unfortunate that the English-language version can’t translate what Koreans would understand, but that is a tall order.

For the English speaker, is watching this fun? Sneering is easy, of course. I do it myself on occasion. But this film, even without understanding the cultural references, is a lot of fun. The special effects do not hold up in 2022—essentially, a guy in a rubber suit stomping on a model city and toy tanks. I personally don’t mind unconvincing special effects. They can be delightful. I’m looking for a story, and a goofy story can be fun. It doesn’t have to be Pulitzer Prize-worthy.

I realize it won’t be everyone’s cup of tea, of course. But I enjoyed it. It was entertaining, silly as it was.

I couldn’t find this as a free download anywhere. Even Internet Archive charges for it.

Title: Yongary, Monster from the Deep Original title: Taekoesu Yonggary (1967)

Directed by Ki-duk Kim

Writing Credits
Ki-duk Kim…(screenplay)
Yun-sung Seo

Cast (in credits order)
Yeong-il Oh…Ko Il-woo (scientist)
Jeong-im Nam…Yoo Soon-a
Soon-jae Lee…Yoo Kwang-nam (as Sun-jae Lee) (astronaut)
Moon Kang…Kim Yu-ri
Kwang Ho Lee…Yoo Young (boy)
Kyoung-min Cho…Yongary (as Cho Kyoung-min)

Released: 1967
Length: 1 hour, 20 minutes



…And the Spring Clean is Complete

author’s pic

This is my last group of books going to the library. The great spring clean is done. The book cases are not quite as full as they once were. But some nifty books found happy homes; a few went directly to friends. That made me feel great. And I got a chance to flip through some old books and recall some happy memories. There were a few exceptions, but most of the time, this was a happy exercise. I imagine I’ll do something like it again in a couple of years, but with fewer books.

author’s pic

The Stuff: When the author visited the town of Lily Dale, founded by Spiritualists in the 19th century, she was a religion reporter for the Dallas Morning News. She’d read a skeptical New York Times article about the hamlet an hour outside Buffalo, New York. She wanted to know more. “I wanted to know why this strange little outpost clings to such absurd ideas,” she writes. “I wanted to know who these people are and what makes them tick.”

A book about people trying to contact their deceased relatives and loved ones shouldn’t be fun, but this is. Wicker gives a history of Spiritualism, the founding and running of Lily Dale, as well as a portrait of its present. Many of the mediums are convinced their deceased loved ones are still around and directing their lives, even when it comes to things like room décor.

The book contains several pages of black and white plates of vintage photographs, suggested reading, questions for the reader, and an interview with the author.

Bio: Christine Wicker (b. 1953) worked for seventeen years as a feature writer, columnist, and religion reporter for the Dallas Morning News. She grew up in the South, with a Baptist preacher and a coal miner in her family tree. Her books include (with John Matthews) The Eyeball Killer (1996), God Knows My Heart (autobiography) (1999), and The Fall of the Evangelical Nation: The Surprising Crisis Inside the Church (2009).

Title: Lily Dale: The Town that Talks to the Dead
Author: Christine Wicker (b. 1953)
First published: 2003

author’s pic

The Stuff: I don’t think I’ve looked at this book since I finished it some twenty-five years ago. My primary memory of it is that the author blames the Enlightenment for a host of modern evils. He also uses words like “holon,” meaning something that works as a whole but is also part of something else. I remember thinking as I was reading this, I liked to think I had a life apart from work, so I was a holon. I was a wage slave and a human being off the time clock.

The bulk of the book is presented in question-and-answer format. Typical of this is the beginning of chapter 7, “Attuned to the Kosmos”:

Q: We must listen very carefully. You mean, to all four types of truth.

K.W. Truth, in the broadest sense, means being attuned with the real. To be authentically in touch with the true, out of touch with the true and the beautiful. Yes?

While this may sound like babbling on the surface, some profound thought is going on. It just didn’t add up to the promise for me. And it sure wasn’t a history of everything, nor did I expect it to be. That’s a promise no one can keep. He didn’t quite sell me on the proposition that all knowledge is one. Yet, I have often noticed connections in things I might not have otherwise.

Bio: Ken Wilber (b. 1949) is an American philosopher and writer influenced by Eastern religion and thought. He developed an intellectual framework he refers to as integral theory that views all knowledge as one. Nothing is entirely wrong or right. Among his books are The Spectrum of Consciousness (1977, anniv. ed. 1993), Sex, Ecology, Spirituality: The Spirit of Evolution (1st ed. 1995, 2nd rev. ed. 2001), and The Marriage of Sense and Soul: Integrating Science and Religion (1998, reprint ed. 1999).


Title: A Brief History of Everything
Author: Ken Wilber (b. 1949)
First published: 1996

author’s pic

The Stuff: This is an examination of the Church of Scientology from its inception to the writing of the book. Wright focuses on the workings of two principal people, L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology’s founder; and his successor, David Miscavige. It is told in straightforward prose, nevertheless it makes for hard reading. Constant themes are the exploitation of people, the courting of celebrities, the abuse—often physical— of members, the separation of families, and the vindictive treatment of anyone who dares to speak out against the organization. This is a sad, scary read.

Wright asks, what makes a religion?

Bio: Lawrence Wright (b. 1947) is an author, screenwriter, playwright, and staff writer for The New Yorker magazine. He’s written eleven nonfiction books, two novels, and one play, in addition to numerous articles. His best-known work is probably The Looming Tower Al-Qaeda and the Road to 9/11 (2006).

Title: Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Belief
Author: Lawrence Wright (b. 1947)
First published: 2013

author’s pic

The Stuff: This was originally written to examine incidents like terrorist attacks on American (and other) interests in places like Beirut and the hostage crisis in Tehran. After the 9/11 attacks, the author added new material and re-released the book. Early on, Wright makes the point that Muslims are not a monolith. Seventy nations have significant Muslim populations, and cultural, historical, and sectarian differences exist. Islam does not condone terrorism.

After examining the history, Wright makes a few remarks saying that the U.S. and other Western countries need a stable, consistent Mid-East policy.

I liked this book, as dire and harrowing a read as it is. Much of the information will be dated. Bin Laden and Sadam Hussein have gone on to meet their makers, for example, but broader questions of a consistent U.S. policy are worth some thought.


Bio: Robin B. Wright (b. 1948) is an American foreign affairs analyst, author and journalist who writes for The New Yorker, she is also fellow of the U.S. Institute of Peace and the Woodrow Wilson Center. Among her books are The Last Great Revolution: Turmoil and Transformation in Iran (2000), Dreams and Shadows: The Future of the Middle East (2008), and Rock the Casbah: Rage and Rebellion Across the Islamic World (2011).

Title: Sacred Rage: The Wrath of Militant Islam
Author: Robin Wright (b. 1948)
First published: 1985 ad. Material 2001

The bookcases I worked on now look like this (with their scared guardians). They are just two of many, I confess.